WHEN GOVERNMENTS OF PAKISTAN WERE CONCERNED ABOUT ARTISTS BIZARRE STORY OF PENSION GIVEN BY TWO PRIME MINISTERS PAKISTAN
The story of partition is about the worthy becoming poor and the corrupt ready to file notorious claims. Financial throwback was there for M.A. Rahman Chughtai and he rendered meritorious services for the Government of Pakistan, like designing flags, insignias, mausoleums, postal stamps, icons for organizations, coins, and gifts for foreign Heads of State, etc etc. In various interactions with Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan, financial help for publication of the book on Dr Iqbal was under discussion. But the assassination of the PM on 16th October, 1951 upset all schedules. An editorial appeared in Daily Imroze about the same, which we enclose as rare thing. At this time another lover of Chughtai Art, Khawaja Nazim-uddin was the Prime Minister. He did not stop proceedings on same.
An editorial appeared in the newspaper IMROZE about the financial condition of artist M.A. Rahman Chughtai. Strangely Nawab Liaquat Ali Khan was fully familiar with the artist, as well as Khawaja Nazimuddin. On instructions from Quaid e Azam, the artist had submitted many designs, which included the flag of Pakistan, insignias for the Government of Pakistan, Postal stamps, and what not? All this meritorious service was free of any charges. To put the country on the art map of the world was the aim here. The designs were appreciated by Quaid e Azam and some were used for same. The Postal Stamps won award in the world, as the most beautiful stamps of the world. The foundation of Pakistan’s first Art Council Alhamra was due to him. The show art Alhamra in 1949 won international laurels as the diplomatic community flew from Karachi to attend the same here. Chughtai was offered visit lectures from both USA and USSR. Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan presented Chughtai’s art works to President Truman in USA as well as to the National Art Gallery in Canada (still there). But the artist was not in good financial condition.
Prime Minister Liaquat Ali KhanPrime Minister Khawaja NazimuddinPrime Minister Lisaquat Ali Khan and MARCKhawaja Nazimuddin and MARCPension book MARC 1Pension book MARC 2Pension book MARC 3Pension book MARC 4Pension book MARC 5PM Liaquat Ali Khan presented Chughtai work to President TrumanEditorial Imroze 10th October 1952 MARCFirst-postal-stamp-1948
An idea was to award a monthly stipend to the artist. The proposal was read by Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan and he seconded it. But before he could initiate it, he was assassinated in Rawalpindi. It was then picked up by Prime Minister Khawaja Nazimuddin and in January, 1953, it was approved as a pension for Rs 500 per month. It was to start from 1st July, 1953. It went on till 1975, and the last one was picked up in January, 1975. The shame was that Rs 500 was a lot of amounts in 1953, but it was not a lot of amounts in 1975. It was the habit of the artist to pick up his finances after three months, every time, in form of Rs 1500.
The news of the pension was reported locally but also in foreign press. For instance, the Lethbridge Herald, 6th November 1953, carried the news internationally.
On 1st January, 1975, I drove him to the State Bank of Pakistan. The realization never came that would be his last pension. Actually 16 days after the same, M.A. Rahman Chughtai died at home in the evening. An era had come to an end.
P.S.
The pension report came in international newspapers too. For example, Lethbridge Herald reported same on 6th November, 1953.
PHOTOGRAPHY REIGNED IN CULTURAL CAPITAL LAHORE; MANY FAMILIES OF PAINTERS PICKED NEW TECHNOLOGY.
It pains me to think that, shunned by West for a long time, knowledge about Lahore became more and more scarce. This adds to most things, and photography is one of them. Certainly world famous photographers stationed in India were visiting Lahore, It applies to Bourne and Shepherd too, like Samuel Bourne. One finds various photographs of people and monuments of Lahore by these photographers. Add to it the other casual visitors who were too bringing in their cameras and shooting personal photographs of Lahore. Most of them ended up being printed in books and journals. The way inward of photographic equipment was taking place.This was a replacement of traditional manuscripts with illustrations, and later by printing versions.
It is probable that the first batch of photographers and equipment was related to the influx of Archaeological survey of India, as well as the Mayo school of Arts. In any case there were a number of studios operating in Lahore, and they included both Hindu and Muslim owners. Studios like P. Girdhar Roy and sons in Anarkali around 1880s and Shankar Dass and Co, around 1911. Muslim owners Andrabi (Mcleod road) and Beg studios (Owner Rashid Beg) again in Anarkali. In Baghbanpura, Abdur Rahman Ejaz and his son Mian Majeed were there. Here also started Photo litho department at Mayo. A commercial requirement of the time. And the most interested was Abdur Rahman Chughtai. Somehow, he got access to a wooden camera with a big Zeis lens and with glass plates in it. He also got his hands on an aerograph pen and air throwing pedal compressor. He achieved fame by making an official photograph of Secy education, an Englishman, and the photo was used at various places. Family portraits became his speciality. But strangely he was also asked by publisher Mian Sirajuddin to make nude photographs of his favourite prostitute in Heera Mandi. The assistance was provided by Miran Baksh, Vice Principal Mayo School of Arts.
There was a Punjab Photographers Association and contests used to be held of various works. M. A Rahman Chughtai used to send his chosen photographs and later used pseudonyms for contests in photography. Others participated too. A new media was largely being innovated here.
MARC undertook massive photographs of monuments in Agra and Delhi and had his dark room on the roof of his house. Dr Zafar Chughtai, his nephew, had a complete album of his monumental works. Various families asked him for group photos and many still had records at present. On 12th February, 1929 Abdur Rahman Chughtai made a number of photos of Dr Iqbal and his son. He colored one with his aerograph pen. In 1930s later a Parsee photographer Rustom P. Kharas made portrait of Dr Iqbal. He signed the same and it was published in Narang Khiyal magazine (a few times), and we have a record of same with his signature. There were also professional copyright photos done by Egyptian Photo Co, on 20th September, 1932. Not much is known about these Photo studios, but we can surmise the background of some.
Egyptian Photo Co, Lahore:A fresh research takes us to a famous personality, known as Meher Baba, who had an Ashram in Nashik, near Bombay. Intercession was also with Ahmedabad. One of his disciples, Rostum K, Irani was born in Ahmedabad in 1898, and disappeared in the Himalayas in August, 1941. He was the son of Kaikhushru Sarosh Irani. A devoted follower of Meher Baba, and possibly his nephew too. He was indulging in photography as well as film making. He appeared in front of Dr Allama Iqbal in 1931 or so. But he signs his name as Rostum P. Kharas. Being son of Kaikhushru, we can understand him writing as Rostum Kaikhushru, but where has Kharas come from? And he adds P, knowing that as Secretary of Meher Baba, he was known as PENDU. And he stops writing Irani with his name. Although it is understood that the whole family had Iranian background. But the remarkable thing is a photograph done in a studio of Dr Allama Iqbal, on 20th september, 1932, and it is copyright by Egyptian Photo Co, Lahore. Why does a company or a studio names itself as Egyptian, when there was no contact with the same.But there is. Meher Baba is seen in Devonshire in 1928, but in 1931, he is pictured in Egypt. A visit which seems to be repeated in 1932, and 1933. To pay homage to him, Rostum K. Kharas named his company in Lahore as Egyptian. There is a trailer available of a film he was making, and it is 1932. So the sequence of same can be explained. But why was Abdur Rahman Chughtai absent from the scene? Very simple the artist was visiting Europe in 1931 and 1932, and was not in Lahore. in his formal dress. it is naturally Dr Allama Iqbal. Obviously the photographs tell us a lot about the photographer and its studio. The initial photos of 1929 and 1931, it is same Allama Iqbal, but the different use of the chair, the carpet (or the Dari), and the expression as well as composition tells us a lot about the photographer. Strange two photos of Rustom P. Kharas are with us, returned from some Photo contest, and are with us and establish a line between both photographers. Perhaps returned as he had disappeared from scene.
Abdur Rahman Chughtai, has a record of many noteworthy photographs of various families and various monuments. Many professional photos were taken by him. This includes his favourite theme of Father and Son, as exhibited in many photographs. On 12th February, 1929, the photograph of Dr Iqbal with his son was taken by him on Eid day at Havelli Nizamuddin. The artist used to frequent the Haveli, because of his connection with its various inmates. In particular Dr Muhammed Taseer, nephew of Mian Nizamuddin.
Rostum P. Kharas (Rostum K. Irani).P stands for Pendu, and K for Kaikhushru: Professional photographer took the sitting photograph of Dr Allama Iqbal in 1931 and the copyright one in 1932 in Western dress. Made the Egyptian Photo Co in Lahore. Later in Havero, Amritsar, participated in Photo Shows. Disappeared in Himalayas in 1941 and never seen again.
Umrao Singh Sher-Gil Majithia (1870–1954) was an Indian aristocrat, scholar of Sanskrit and philosophy, and photographer. He was known as one of the pioneers of photography in India, leaving behind over 3,000 prints, including the hundreds of family portraits and over 80 self-portraits staged in a mise-en-scène style. Amrita Sher Gil, the famous artist took a photograph of Dr Allama Iqbal in Paris, and she was daughter of Umrao Singh Sher-Gil Majithia. Necessary for record of that period.
With the death of Dr Allama Iqbal in 1938, the photography craze and had come to an end and led to sketches of him done by Abdur Rahman Chughtai, as well as the famous etching of him. Painted representation is in the book Amal-e-Chughtai. However detailed writing of the meetings are in various articles. There is a signed book of Bang darya, signed Afghan visit, a letter to Narang Khiyal, a letter condoling the death of Chughtais mother in 1925, as well as other letters. The original Foreword of Murraqqa e Chughtai is missing but advance copy is there. Iqbal’s tick of his best verses of Ghalib are there too. May both great men rest in peace!
WHO SPINS THE NARRATION OF OUR BELOVED COUNTRY? EVER HELL BENT ON PROMOTING HINDU, SIKH, NARRATIVES; ANOTHER BOOK ON LAHORE BY NEELUM CHAUDRI, IGNORANT, OF NATIONAL ARTIST OF PAKISTAN, AND HIS CHUGHTAI MUSEUM.
It is noticeable for a long time. There was an elite who fostered our country and its ideology. And there arose another group of elite, who continuously spoke of our country in perspective of geography only. It started with the role of MI 6 itself. The British left with their cronies behind, to muddle the Ideology of Pakistan. And to steal the Art treasures of Pakistan. This was told to me by Basil Gray, former Curator of British Museum, who inaugurated one of our shows in 1977, and was looking forward to curating a show of Chughtai Art in Teheran of the Shahbanou Foundation. I have written about it many times.
Abdur Rahman Chughtai died on 17th January, 1975, and we immediately began a world tour of promoting him. On 17th January, 1976, we held our first show. We have held more than 65 shows in the last fifty years. We helped hundreds of students and scholars to research on Chughtai Art. From many who did their PHDS on Chughtai Art, to even high school students writing on Chughtai Sahib. Endless list and signed affidavits with us. We started various publications on Lahore and Abdur Rahman Chughtai. First for some years BEAUTY series. Later NATIONS IN ACTION series. We invited world class scholars from all over the world here to give lectures on Chughtai art. Later we started a blog which to date was seen in 204 countries, with total views of 696,727 from all over the world. For instance 77,975 views from USA and 79,306 views from even India. A few hundred views from even Israel and Cuba. And yet there are groups who totally ignore us.
So who is behind controlling our adverse narrations? Foreign lobbies with their paid agents here.
A number of so called morons struts the streets of Lahore, looking for any signs of Hindu temples and Hindu Havelis. Not understanding that decline of Muslims in Lahore started after the 1857 Mutiny. The walls of Lahore were brought down, the gates demolished, and the gallis widened so that no uprising could take place. Muslims were stressed out, a poverty class overnight.Muslim households could not even sustain the houses they lived in. We are not merely patriotic p[eople, we are patriotic to the Spirit of Islam. Dr Allama Iqbal wrote the RECONSTRUCTION lectures to guide us for future at all times. All we and the adverse group can think of is belittle our national icons, including Dr Allama Iqbal and Quaid e Azam. It is a fight between SOULS and SOULLESS people. Even Amrita Sher Gill honoured Dr Allama Iqbal by making a photograph of him in Paris. Romance is created of atheists who do not even believe in Allah, how can they believe in Pakistan?
Neelum Chaudri ignorant of Chughtai MuseumLAHORE A love storyKishwar Bano inauguration stoneInaugural New Wing of Chughtai MuseumA routine of American AmbassadorsAmrita Sher-Gil photoNot-the-Time-to-Rest
Abdur Rahman Chughtai, the legend who introduced the word Chughtai Art for a beautiful girl in Urdu vocabulary, as reflected in many films of that time, when the hero calls his beloved as Chughtai art. The artist who put Lahore on the art map of the world again. An artist who designed insignias for Pakistan, and an art which western scholars called him MODERN MASTER OF ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION. A true native of Lahore from the last many generations, and spineless authors are afraid of even giving his name, for retribution from Masters. A spotless character, who Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan, designated as the NATIONAL ARTIST OF PAKISTAN.
CHUGHTAI MUSEUM faced the wrath of various governments in Pakistan, at both Federal and provincial level. Not for anything we have done, but our motivations of welfare of not only Pakistan, but its Ideology. When two penny junkies speak against our country, it boils us down. Stop it! Love Pakistan, or leave Pakistan. We do not need lunatics like you here, who cut the branch on which they stand. Pakistan is the Islamic Republic, the first step towards a better world.
P.S.
Poet Neelum Chaudri, please learn more about Abdur Rahman Chughtai and Chughtai Museum. It is not a world of ignorance.
THE SPIRITUAL GODDESS OF MUGHAL KINGDOM JAHAN ARA DAUGHTER OF AN EMPEROR LIFE DEDICATED TO COMMONERS MOTHER BURIED IN TAJ MAHAL, SHE BURIED IN SINGLE GRAVE
Books can be written on Jahan Ara and books have been written, but she herself wrote books and also wrote verses. No Diwan has come out so far, but her takhallus was BEGUM SAHIBA and verses have been recovered from various sources. Some of her books are found here and there, mostly on Muslim Saints of our region. Chughtai Museum is proud to possess one of her books, written probably by Dara Shikoh himself and the final copy, her presentation to her father Emperor Shah Jahan in Jamia Masjid, Delhi. All this is recorded on the manuscript itself.
The calligrapher is AINEE. No Ainee is known, but we do know that due to her love for brother Dara Shikoh, she used to call him Ain, or in more personal terms as Ainee. The reference to Dara Shikoh in the book is written simply and she in her own hands has corrected the attributes, which shows that Dara did not regard his name in a royal way and she corrected it.
Bayaz Zebu-unnisa verses Jahan-AraMunis Arwah 1Munis Arwah 2Munis Arwah 3 Autograph Jahan Ara16-Jahan-Ara-at-the-Taj-(Version-2)Grave of Jahan Ara
The Manuscript of Munis Arwah is only one of three 17th century manuscripts known to exist. As the book was written in 1049 AH 1640 AD, the two others found are different. An Autograph copy is known to exist in Lucknow but of a later date. There is a beautiful Ms in Azamgarh dated 1068 AH. But ours is the earliest Manuscript known and is dated 1051 AH, although the presentation part to Emperor Shah Jahan is later, both in Ajmer as well as in Jamia Masjid Delhi. Ours stands as the rarest and very very beautiful and elegantly written.
A lot is said about Jahan Ara and we will write more but where we introduce a rare manuscript of hers, we also reproduce the verses she wrote on the death of her father:
“Oh thou Sun of mine that hast hidden thyself from my eyes, Will there ever be a morning to this night of separation. Thou monarch of the world and qibla of existence, Open thine eye of mercy and behold our condition. I cry in sorrow and it availeth me nothing, I burn like the candle in anguish and there is smoke in my head.”
Jahan Ara is the epitome of our women hood and to this days fathers love to name their daughters after the spiritual goddess of Mughal kingdom.
THE 167TH DEATH ANNIVERSARY OF SALAH MIMAR CHAUGHATA – THE CREATIVE LEGACY IN LAHORE OF M.A. RAHMAN CHUGHTAI
The ancestral background is amazing in its perspective. Two architects of Herat, namely Yusuf Mimar and Isa Mimar, sought guidance under Mimar Sinan of Turkey. Historians speak of their journey to Hindustan with Emperor Zaheer ud din Baber. Infatuated with Lahore, they sought their residence here and moved to other areas of the region. However Ahmad was born in Lahore and the affix Lahori was attached to his name forever. Our archives are full of facts about this creative family. A whole almarih of manuscripts and documents on them.
Salah Mimar Chaughata died 11th May 1858
This is pay homage on the 167th death anniversary of Mian Salah Mimar Chaughata, who was born in Lahore and died here on 11th May, 1858. He was reputed to have attained the age of 120 years plus. Many Sikh buildings as well as of later Mughal period are attributed to him. References are there. Khalsa Darbar Records also tells us the obvious. But his two sons Mian Raheem Baksh and Natha (Mian Elahi Baksh) were also amazing in their own rights. Mian Raheem Baksh also an able architect, carries as a record certificates of many English administrators and engineers. Mian Raheem Baksh was father of Mian Kareem Baksh, again a hardworking Mimar, as also the father of Abdur Rahman Chughtai, Mussawar e Mashriq, National artist of Pakistan, and Modern Master of Twentieh century Islamic Civilization.
Fathers and sons leaving a legacy of creativity. A house in Chabuk Sawaran where only one portion is left, and the land still there, with a blue plaque on it, courtesy of a Lahori organization, and sensitive architect, Ms Fauzia Quraishi. Where we find so many unconcerned persons, there is pride in the fact that sensitive people still exist and surely keep the flag flying of creative endeavours anywhere. Lahore may not remember in its official organizations, but certainly people keep things alive.
Ever since the day I got my hands on the miniature of my great great grandfather, I fell in love with him. Imagine in those difficult days, could he imagine a great great grandson, loving him, with the image in front of him. BABA SALAH I LOVE YOU! And as long as I live your memory will remain fresh in my heart.
We write about the family all the time. This is a day to remember their contributions to culture of Lahore.
FASCINATION OF THE WEST WITH ALIENS; YET NO ACCOUNT OF ISLAMIC CONCEPTION. PAKISTAN FOREVER ENDORSED BY ALIENS.
“And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds.” – 21:107
At times dates are important. This date is important for both the world as well as Pakistan. On 8th July, 1947, is the day that Sir Cyril Radcliffe arrived in India to draw the boundary lines for the Partition of India and Pakistan. And on that same day two alien crafts crashed in the world famous Roswell incident, although one craft was recovered much later. It was surmised that both crashed together. The craft was recovered along with bodies of the aliens. Some say that some of the aliens were alive and died later.It came in the newspaper and then the news was suppressed for reasons unknown. Then bogus stories were made of that incident, although to this day people believe otherwise. Funny that the hoax itself was named Mughal. Roswell incident does not go away.
In the Quran it is clearly written that Allah has placed life on various parts of the cosmos. Allah says that Allah has created humankind as a most superior being, for Allah has given humans the capacity to choose between right and wrong. This favour was not given to others.
For us Quran is the beacon light. As you know a group of “jinn” declared their eiman after listening to a recital of the Quran from the Rasool, and it is recorded in the pages of the Quran itself. The whole story appears in 72:1-15. Replace jinn with alien and it actually implies that aliens live among humans, and are unable to return to their home world because space is too dangerous for interstellar travel (so this might mean they crash landed on earth with no way back). These jinn say that they have believers and disbelievers in their community, just like humans. They even mention a “foolish one” who misled their people about God, while the Quran makes perfect sense to them. So their “foolish one” must have been a false prophet or equivalent.
Muhammed GreyAlien in Pakistani dressAlien after JinnahAliens welcoming PakistanUFOS and Vatican
The jinn/alien account might not imply an alien crash. It might be a long-distance communication. The surah opens with an instruction to the Rasool to announce to human beings the news that the jinn have “heard” the Quran. It is not implying that they met the Prophet, but rather that Allah has revealed this information to him, and he has been asked to pass on the message.
This makes more sense when taken into account another section of the Quran that mentions, quite clearly, that humans will only ever have a limited capacity for interstellar travel. The jinn/aliens too say, in this Quranic account, that they tried to go into “the heaven” (singular) but were stopped. A thought this meant they were prevented from leaving earth, but it more likely means they were prevented from travelling too far beyond their home planet.
More than seventy years, and the West is not ready to offer the secrets. President Donald Trump promised revelation but could not do so at all. Fear of repercussions. Jacques Vallee in a speech as well as in his books clearly say that the lack of revelation is not only due to security reasons but the religious complexities that the revelation will create in our minds. That these beings come from other dimensions or FROM THE FUTURE. Or is it as simple as that, the aliens clear the Islamic conception, and the West could not commit suicide by talking and endorsing Islam in any way. And the whistleblowers are there more to confuse the issue with use of AI, and intent of most losing direction.
It is disclosed that even the Vatican has documents about UFOs, hidden ones, but the surprising thing is that they are in Arabic and have Seal of Muslim rulers on them. Check yourself! Not being revealed because of danger to religion. We can guess dangerous to other religions, not Islamic conception of DEEN, which recognizes Alien life, as ascertained by the Quran itself.
And among His signs is the creative design of the heavens and the earth, and the
living creatures which He has dispersed throughout them. And He is Able to
gather them together when He wills. [Here is an allusion to the existence of
life in other celestial bodies, and to man meeting with the ‘aliens’ someday. 42:29
Indeed, before God, bows in submission all that is in the heavens and all that is on
earth, from all moving creatures to the angels, for none are arrogant. 16:49
A STUDY OF LETTERS OF LEONARDO DA VINCI BIZARRE REVELATIONS, CONTACTS WITH TURKISH SULTANS AND OFFER OF HELP IN PROJECTS.
Lisa Jardine, the late scholar from the University of London, writes: “In a series of letters written around 1484 and preserved in one of his many notebooks, Leonardo reports to someone he calls Devatdar Kait-Bai, on the findings of a lengthy scientific mission conducted along the politically contested Turkish coast. (Was Leonardo there in Turkey?) But Sultan Qaitbay was in fact the cultivated and culturally ambitious Mamluk Sultan at this date.” It is understood that East and West were on the road to cross fertilization of aesthetics.
Leonardo da VinciFranz Babinger researchLeonardo_Bridgeleonardo-da-vinci-arundel-codex-1Lisa JardineVenetian artist Gentile Bellini 15th centuryTurk painter by Gentile BelliniSultan letter to Leonardo VinciLeonardo-3-1024×683Sultan Bayezid and Leonardo da VinciMausoleum of Sultan Qaitbay
The Renaissance art between East and West is being thoroughly documented and exposes the bigotry of some scholars, for some such exchanges put their arrogance to shame. One such brilliant artist was Gentile Bellini, who worked at the Sultan’s court itself. But the most amazing is exchange of letters between Turkish Sultan Bayezid and Leonardo da Vinci in 1502. The reply to Leonardo da Vinci is kept in the Topkapi museum in Turkey. It has been published too, and we reproduce same. A bridge is being proposed by Leonardo to bridge the Bay in Turkey. Modern scholars have worked on the design of the bridge and found it utterly feasible. In fact, the same design was actually used elsewhere, and worked well. It is strange that this did not work out at that time, otherwise it would have been another wonder of the world. The Sultan was apprehensive of the engineering, and did not think much of this “Kafir” as stated in the letter. But Leonardo had assured him that it would work. And it would have. History did not accept that.
It was a letter asking for employment. In which Leonardo also claims to know how to build windmills and pumps to extract water from ships. Then he talks about the bridge over the Golden Horn.
“I, your servant, have heard of your intention to build a bridge from Istanbul to Galata. And that you have not yet built it because it is impossible to find one who can build it. I, your servant, know how to do it. One would raise it to the height of a building so that no one can cross it because it is too high. I will do it so that a ship can pass under it even with the sails raised. I would make a drawbridge so that when one wants, one can pass to the Anatolian coast. May God make you believe these words, and consider that this servant of yours will always be at your service”.
Up to now, we always though that The bridge for the Sultan that he designed was too far ahead of its times to work on those openings. Due to the limitations of the building materials. It resembles the Calatrava bridge in Venice. And, even more, it resembles (in a small way) an existing bridge in China, in Zhaozhou. Built between 589 and 618 with a single arch of 37 meters and with a rise of 7 meter. Or several other Chinese bridges built during the Song Dynasty.
JOURNEY OF HUNDRED YEARS FROM LAHORE; TO CALCUTTA AND BACK FROM 1924 TO 2024. RARE WORK ABDUR RAHMAN CHUGHTAI ON SILK.
M.A. Rahman Chughtai participated in his first exhibition in 1920 at the Lahore Museum. On record it is there that all his paintings were sold. He was sending images of his paintings for publication, more so in Modern Review Calcutta, as well as others, like Prabhabasi. The first one got printed in January, 1917. His fame through these publications was spreading in the Art world. By 1920s his works were being exhibited all over India, including Calcutta, Bombay, Travancore, Mussoorie and other places. The big event was a planned exhibition of Indian Art at Wembley and a Board was constituted to select paintings for the same. We have the catalogue of Artworks exhibited at Wembley. The list does not include the painting which is subject of our present research. The work “Charm of the East” was acquired by the Prince of Wales Museum, Bombay. Our researched work is dated 1924, and can be anything. We checked catalogues of both Bombay and Calcutta. A lot of Chughtai Artworks are included there but not this one. It may be surmised that it was not selected for the show at Wembley by the constituted Board. The Indian Fine Arts Committee was appointed on 4th August, 1923, The board was composed of O.C. Gangoly, Lionel Heah, S.N. Gupta, and W.G. Solomon. In total selected 11 paintings of M.A. Rahman Chughtai for the Wembley show. Some must have been rejected. Descriptive catalogue points to three places, that is Calcutta, Bombay, and Lahore. The present painting under reference must have been struck out. Its travel journey seems not to be recorded by events.
On 6th February, 2025, I received an enquiry from Calcutta from a lady Soumitra Kumar Nahar, and interested in knowing about a painting left by her late father, Barun Kumar Nahar, related to M.A. Rahman Chughtai. Later I was told that:
“Based on our research, the work was originally part of the collection of Mr. Gopi Krishna Kanoria, who was born in Patna on May 9, 1917, and passed away on October 16, 1987. He was known for his significant art collection, particularly sculptures and paintings from Rajasthan and Central India. Subsequently, he sold it to Mr. B.K. Nahar, a renowned collector of Bengal School artworks in Calcutta.”
Yes, the painting was on silk, and was by my father M.A. Rahman Chughtai. I confirmed same. Lot of works are sent to me from India, but most are outright fakes.
The name of the painting:
There is a typed name for the painting. It was physically corrected with ink, from D to S, but in restoration correction removed. It normally looks like “Dawan at Hamaliah”, which is basically not right. As the type is obscure and the people there were not familiar with the language, It was presumed that the name meant Dawn, although it was spelled as Dawan in type. in my opinion it is “Sawan at Hamaliah”. What does that mean? “Sawan” means monsoons rain and wind. “Hamaliah” literally means the Himalayan mountains. In the painting itself the hanging stole is flying, as well as a bare chest covered with a damp clothed veil, also in the air.
Date workRestored Inscription oneHand corrected SMARC – Recto SunRare Moon shotThe-Morning-StarFame 1917Shakti DevtaSawan at Hamaliah restored
The painting is on silk:
The usual working style of M.A. Rahman Chughtai is watercolour on paper. The paper is usually handmade paper of Whatman England. But in the initial period the artist did at times experiment working on silk. His friend Mian Inayatullah usually painted on silk. The artist is known to have made curtains for close friend Pitras Bokhari (expressed in his letter) as well as lamp shades. A few paintings were done. A friend and neighbour had one of the works on silk, but his son in law had taken the painting to the UK and the present location is not known. But most of the other works perished. The so-called controversial (actually not) painting “Poison Cup” was there with family of Mian Inayatullah, some years back. Presently not known. The painting “Fame” made originally in 1917, and modified, exists with a Doctor in the UK, but may not be on silk. In reality this may be the only one Silk painting of Chughtai known to exist and this extremely rare in its existence. Others are open to speculation.
The work has the image of the Moon in it:
Normally due to deciphering of the name Dawan (which is Sawan) as Dawn, it was understood that in the work we see a rising Sun. Upto the best of my knowledge there is very little use of objects as Moon, Morning Star, and planetary correlations. I think there is no painting in which the Sun is shown, simply because the portrayal in Chughtai works is romantic, and subdued. Not as fiery as the Sun. Here we do not see the rising Sun but the sinking Moon. Even the colouring of same shows that. And it speaks of wind and rain on the Himalayan mountains and the figure enjoying the same with a veil covering her naked breasts. The clothes are not vertically done but literally flying in the strong wind. Enough said.
The figure in the work is heavily jewelled:
It reminds us of various paintings done by Chughtai Sahib on the subject of Shiva and Parvati. We use one work of Shakti Devta for same. Other works of Parvati exist of the same type. Not all can be shown here.
The whole episode is full of romance:
A painting goes from Lahore, at the Chabuk Sawaran home of the artist, probably by train, and reaches Cakcutta. It goes through a process of selection and lies somewhere. There is a record that there were eight Chughtai works with O.C. Gangoly and they were not returned. A harsh correspondence is there on the subject. Perhaps this was one of them. Then it gets into the hand of a collector and then it is passed on. And presently being restored, I presume by professional people. Yes, art dies many deaths. But at times it lives on. But as a creation it lives on forever. A Hindu subject by a Muslim artist of repute even then. It unites various nations. Art is a sign of peace, a sign of love. Let us engender this kind of love between our two nations. Yes, harmony will prevail!
UMRO BIN MUHAMMED SON OF QASIM AND LADI A FORGOTTEN AND LOST GOVERNOR OF SIND THE LEGACY OF MUHAMMED BIN QASIM
I do not think we hear much of Muhammed bin Qasim at all. We only hear of the tussle between Islam and Hinduism. The character and life of the man is left uncertain. The love of Qasim and Ladi actually speaks of the rebellion of the women hood in Sindh at that time. When warriors were ordered to assassinate all women folks on the brink of Dahir’s defeat, the warrior attached to Ladi, actually hesitated, and Ladi jumped to the ground from the camel she was riding. In this way she escaped her husband’s (actual brother) wrath, and certain death. When she was saved by the army folks attached to Qasim, it was her luck again. And then Qasim bought her from those who had captured her and certainly it seemed the prophesy had come true. The prophesy was that Ladi would marry a Ruler of Sind and will give birth to another. Not that we believe in any such prophesy as being the truth. It was the love radiation between the two characters.
We are told that Qasim was so much loved, that they put a life size statue of Qasim on the chowk of their main city. But we have forgotten one more thing. The product of the love of Qasim and Ladi, the son born to the living couple. They named him UMRO, and he was brought up in Sindh itself. When Qasim was removed, as the new Caliph did not approve of him (different versions of his death are there), the situation in Sindh had changed after all. Historians talk of a grave of Muhammed bin Qasim in Mosul, here he was tortured at the behest of the new Caliph. This is contrary to the story given in the Chach-nama, which is obviously the floated legend at that time.
fight-for-sindhqasims-timeMuhammad-Bin-Qasim
In any case UMRO was reared up in Sindh, and must have become popular with the people, as he became eventually a Governor of Sindh. We have not come across more material on him, but we will search for same, as there is evidence here, that the DNA of Qasim is still in Sindh to this day. It reminds me of a 9000 year old skeleton they discovered in a mining cave in Scotland, and after research in the nearby village (the entire’s village DNA sample was taken), they found a match to the DNA. A living person descendant of a miner 9000 years old. What fun it would be to discover a descendant of Muhammed bin Qasim in Sindh?
There was another son of Muhammed bin Qasim and he was named simply as Qasim. He was Governor of Basra for 15 years, and also reached a certain kind of fame in his lifetime. So one leaves for Arabia, the other remains in Sindh. There must be more about them in some archives. Suffice that Qasim did not conquer Sindh in the battlefield alone, he conquered the hearts of Sindh and that is why Sindh never became a Hindu nation again. Three cheers for the icon of all times!
QASIM AND LADI A ROMANCE OF SIND All is fair in love and war
Everyone has heard about the story of the advent of Islam in this region. And everyone has their own view on it. Obviously for us Muslims, Muhammed bin Qasim is the hero, not because he was a Muslim, but he came in form of undoing wrongs committed here. The Muslim women who had requested to be rescued and how they were rescued by this young man, a mere 17 years old. Many ethnically bound here equate Dahir as their hero, for limited ethnic reasons. Here Qasim was the good guy, and it can be judged from his behavior here. No less that the people of SIND worshiped him as a hero and made a life size statue of him in the chowk of their major city. But here we are talking of a love affair.
The Queen of Sind was love smitten by the looks of Chach. Chach was father of Raja Dahir. Ladi was a product of a love affair. Astrologers had predicted that Raja Dahir’s sister LADI would marry a man, who would rule Sind with full might. A superstitious Raja Dahir ended the speculation by marrying his sister himself, to become that all powerful ruler. But that was not to be so.
Raja Dahir had given instructions for all the ladies of the Royal harem and wives of the courtiers to be beheaded immediately if defeat of the Hindu army was imminent. Warriors watched over these ladies and when the news came of their defeat, the slaughter of the Hindu ladies started by the Hindus themselves. Ladi threw herself from her camel onto those on the ground who were meant to behead her, and in this ruse, they were dazzled to the extent, that it gave time to Arabs to save Ladi from slaughter. The captors took her in their possession.
Muhammad Bin Qasim MasjidPir Pattho – Muhammad Bin Qasim Fort tower
Muhammed bin Qasim found out about the capture of Ladi, and sought permission from the Caliph in purchasing her from her captors (laws governed behavior). When the permission came, he bought her and made her his wife. The prediction was coming true. Ladi had seen the softness in the looks of Qasim, and Qasim had seen the demure of this exceptional lady. It seems love had happened at first sight.
The Chach-nama gives us flashes of incidents here and there. It also give us a flash of a sister of Raja Dahir ‘Bai’ burning herself and all the other ladies in a fire ritual in a room. It is not clear if Ladi and Bai are two characters or same persons. The death of the lady Bai is mysterious.
We are also told about how Ladi confused the warriors outside the ramparts by mounting a camel and in black dress going for a ride. It was considered a deliberate tactic in favour of the Arabs. If Chach nama had survived in full, we would have had all the information required, but even in the annals of one of the greatest battles in the history of the region, it is intermersed with a love story. The love story of Qasim and Ladi. The end is not known, nor we hear of their children. But it is a ballad for folk singers for all times.